The artefact under review被審視的那份東西

A plan is meant to be argued with. plan 就是拿來被爭論的。

These are the whole documents, not summaries. Publishing a summary of the thing this project claims is the asset would undercut the claim. Each is TOML in the repository, and each is shown below exactly as the tools resolve it. 下面是完整的文件，不是摘要。對一個宣稱「這才是資產」的專案來說，只公開摘要會把那個宣稱削掉。它們在 repo 裡是 TOML，而下面顯示的就是工具解析後的樣子。

Styles, and the styles to avoid風格，和要避開的風格

A prohibition written as a positive style competes with the real positives for the model's attention; written as a negative style it does not compete at all. It is not cosmetic: on the only structured surface here, the flag that forces an instrumental is documented for text prompts only — a composition plan cannot use it. The documented way to silence a section is to name vocals among its negative styles. Without an avoid list, "instrumental" would have been a wish.把禁止寫成正向風格，會跟真正的正向風格搶模型的注意力；寫成負向風格就完全不會搶。這不是裝飾：在這裡唯一有結構的那個表面上，強制純演奏的那個旗標只對文字 prompt 有效 —— composition plan 用不了它。官方寫法是把 vocals 放進該段的負向風格。沒有 avoid 清單的話，「instrumental」就只是一個願望。

Global styles are not global everywhere全域風格不是到哪都全域

One provider's current plan format is an ordered list of chunks, and a chunk has no global styles field at all. A translator that emitted only the local styles would produce a request that validates, generates, bills, and sounds nothing like the plan. So the resolved list is shown per section below — global first, because the earliest styles establish the direction for the whole piece.其中一家目前的 plan 格式是一串有順序的 chunk，而一個 chunk 根本沒有全域風格欄位。一個只送出區域風格的轉譯器，會產生一個「驗證過、生成了、扣款了、但完全不像 plan」的 request。所以下面每一段顯示的是解析後的完整清單 —— 全域在前，因為最前面的風格會決定整首的方向。

Loading the plans…正在讀取 plan…